4.8 Article

Identification and characterization of a human DNA glycosylase for repair of modified bases in oxidatively damaged DNA

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.062053799

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R56 CA090860, R01 CA084461, R01 CA081063, CA90860, R01 CA090860, CA 84461, CA81063] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES006676, ES06676] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), ring-opened purines (formamidopyrimidines or Fapys), and other oxidized DNA base lesions generated by reactive oxygen species are often mutagenic and toxic, and have been implicated in the etiology of many diseases, including cancer, and in aging. Repair of these lesions in all organisms occurs primarily via the DNA base excision repair pathway, initiated with their excision by DNA glycosylase/AP lyases, which are of two classes. One class utilizes an internal Lys residue as the active site nucleophile, and includes Escherichia coli Nth and both known mammalian DNA glycosylase/AP lyases, namely, OGG1 and NTH1. E. coli MutM and its paralog Nei, which comprise the second class, use N-terminal Pro as the active site. Here, we report the presence of two human orthologs of E. coli mutM nei genes in the human genome database, and characterize one of their products. Based on the substrate preference, we have named it NEH1 (Nei homolog). The 44-kDa, wild-type recombinant NEH1, purified to homogeneity from E. coli, excises Fapys from damaged DNA, and oxidized pyrimidines and 8-oxoG from oligodeoxynucleotides. Inactivation of the enzyme because of either deletion of N-terminal Pro or Histag fusion at the N terminus supports the role of N-terminal Pro as its active site. The tissue-specific levels of NEW and OGG1 mRNAs are distinct and S phase-specific increase in NEH1 at both RNA and protein levels suggests that NEW is involved in replication-associated repair of oxidized bases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available