4.7 Article

Intrinsic sinus and atrioventricular node electrophysiologic adaptations in endurance athletes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 1033-1038

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01722-9

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES In the present study, we evaluated sinus and atrioventricular (AV) node electrophysiology of endurance athletes and untrained individuals before and after autonomic pharmacologic blockade. BACKGROUND Endurance athletes present a higher prevalence of sinus bradycardia and AV conduction abnormalities, as compared with untrained individuals. Previous data from our laboratory suggest that nonautonomic factors may be responsible for the longer AV node refractory period found in well-trained athletes. METHODS Six aerobically trained male athletes and six healthy male individuals with similar ages and normal rest electrocardiograms were studied. Maximal oxygen uptake ((V) over dot O(2)max) was measured by cardiopulmonary testing. The sinus cycle length (SCL), AV conduction intervals, sinus node recovery time (SNRT), Wenckebach cycle (WC) and anterograde effective refractory period (ERP) of the AV node were evaluated by invasive electrophysiologic studies at baseline, after intravenous atropine (0.04 mg/kg) and after addition of intravenous propranolol (0.2 mg/kg). RESULTS Athletes had a significantly higher (V) over dot O(2)max as compared with untrained individuals. The SCL was longer in athletes at baseline, after atropine and after the addition of propranolol for double-autonomic blockade. The mean maximal SNRT/SCL was longer in athletes after atropine and after propranolol. The WC and anterograde ERP of the AV node were longer in athletes at baseline, after atropine and after propranolol. CONCLUSIONS Under double-pharmacologic blockade, we demonstrated that sinus automaticity and AV node conduction changes of endurance athletes are related to intrinsic physiology and not to autonomic influences. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1033-8) (C) 2002 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available