4.5 Article

Functional expression of TREK-2 K+ channel in cultured rat brain astrocytes

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 931, Issue 1, Pages 56-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)02261-8

Keywords

potassium channel; 4TM/2P domain; pressure; fatty acid; astrocyte; brain

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background K+ channels whose subunit contains four transmembrane segments and two pore-forming domains (4TM/2P) have been cloned recently. We studied whether 4TM/2P K+ channels are functionally expressed in astrocytes that are known to have a large background (resting) K+ conductance and a large resting membrane potential. Reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis showed that, among five 4TM/2P K+ channels examined, TASK-1, TASK-3 and TREK-2 mRNAs were expressed in cultured astrocytes from rat cortex. In cell-attached patches, we mainly observed three K+ channels with single-channel conductances of 30, 117 and 176 pS (-40 mV) in symmetrical 140 mM KCl. The 30 pS channel was the inward rectifying K+ channel that has been previously described in astrocytes. The 117 pS K+ channel also showed inward rectification and was insensitive to 1 mM tetraethylammonium and 1 mM 4-aminopyridine. The 176 pS channel was the Ca2+-activated K+ channel. The 117 pS K+ channel was determined to be TREK-2, as judged by its electrophysiological properties and activation by membrane stretch, free fatty acids and intracellular acidosis. In similar to50% of astrocytes in culture, whole-cell K+ current increased markedly following application of arachidonic acid. The number of TREK-2 channels in these cells was estimated to be similar to500-1000/cell. Our results show that TREK-2 is functionally expressed in cortical astrocytes in culture, and suggest that TREK-2 may be involved in K+ homeostasis of astrocytes during pathological states. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available