4.2 Article

Prevalence of drug use during pregnancy: a pharmacoepidemiological approach

Journal

REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 205-212

Publisher

REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA
DOI: 10.1590/S0034-89102002000200013

Keywords

drug use; pregnancy; questionnaires; prenatal care; socioeconomic factors; prevalence; pharmacoepidemiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Few Brazilian papers on the use of medication in pregnancy have been found in the indexed medical literature. This paper describes the use of medication during pregnancy among women who gave birth in a teaching maternity hospital in the city of Campinas, Brazil. Methods A retrospective study on the pattern of drug use during pregnancy was conducted among 1,000 mothers who were interviewed using a structured questionnaire after delivery, while they were still in hospital. The following parameters were registered: sociodemographic characteristics, obstertric and contraceptive history, data on prenatal cure and medications used during pregnancy. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and chi-square test at p = 0.05. Results Among the interviewed patients, 94.6% had taken at least one medication during pregnancy, and 46.1% had used medication in the first trimester. Of 3,788 medications reported, 88.8% had been prescribed by a doctor The median of medications taken was 3 (ranging from 0 to 18). The six most used classes of medications were: analgesics, spasmolytics, gynecological antiinfectious agents, antianemics, antacids and systemic antibiotics. The five most used medications were: butyl scopolamine, ferrous sulfate, dipirone, nistatin and multivitamin tablets. Only 27.7% of the patients had been alerted to the risk of laking medication during pregnancy. Conclusion Knowing the profile of medications used during pregnancy may help devising programs to provide information to the patients and continuing education to health care professionals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available