4.4 Article

Neuropsychological performance of individuals dependent on crack-cocaine, or crack-cocaine and alcohol, at 6 weeks and 6 months of abstinence

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages 161-171

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0376-8716(01)00197-1

Keywords

brain damage; cocaine; alcoholism; neuropsychological; assessment

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA009453-06, DA09453] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Little data exist on the neuropsychological effects of crack-cocaine dependence or crack-cocaine and alcohol dependence. This study examined cognitive function in abstinent crack dependent and crack and alcohol dependent individuals at 6 weeks and 6 months abstinence. Methods: a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, including the MicroCog computerized assessment, was administered to 20 abstinent crack dependent subjects. 37 abstinent crack and alcohol dependent subjects, and 29 normal controls. Depression was examined as a covariate. and the association between substance use variables and neuropsychological performance was examined. Results: the two substance dependent groups had similar neuropsychological profiles at 6 weeks abstinent. with both groups exhibiting significant cognitive impairment in a wide range of functions compared to controls. The substance dependent groups were still impaired significantly at 6 months of abstinence. Only mild effects of depression on neuropsychological performance were observed. Conclusions: crack dependence and crack and alcohol dependence may lead to severe and persistent neuropsychological deficits over a wide range of domains. The strongest predictor of brain damage associated with substance dependence in this sample was dose (particularly quantity and duration of peak dose). (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available