4.5 Article

Cladistic biogeography and the art of discovery

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 427-444

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2002.00687.x

Keywords

area cladistics; geographical congruence; paralogy; sub-tree analysis; Assumption 2; BPA; generation and discovery paradigm; continental drift; palaeomagnetics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims Cladistic biogeography is about discovering geographical congruence. The agreement of several taxon-area cladograms (TACs) rarely yields a perfect result. Areas may overlap, taxa may not be evenly distributed, and thus, ambiguity may be prevalent in the data. Ambiguity is incongruence and may be resolved by reducing paralogy and resolving potential information. Recently, several new approaches in cladistic biogeography [i.e. Brooks parsimony analysis (BPA), Assumption 0] interpret ambiguity as congruence. These methods are problematic, as they are generational . Methods constructed under the generation paradigm are flawed concepts that are immunized from falsifying evidence. A critique of modified BPA reveals that taking an evolutionary stance in biogeography leads to flaws in implementation. Methods Area cladistics is a new development in cladistic biogeography. Area cladistics adopts paralogy-free subtree analysis using Assumption 2, to discover the relative positions of continents through time. Results Geographical congruence is the result of allopatric (geographical) speciation. Vicariance, dispersal and combinations of both, are recognized causes for allopatric speciation. Area cladistics highlights the concept that all these events occur in response to geological changes (e.g. continental drift) either directly, by geographical boundaries, or indirectly, at the level of ocean currents. Samples of chosen examples all respond to the geological process. The examples include Ordovician-Silurian and Lower Devonian trilobites to yield a general areagram which is a representational branching diagram that depicts the relationships of areas. Main conclusion Finding one common biogeographical pattern from several unrelated groups is a qualitative approach to interpret the positions of continental margins through time. Area cladistics is not a substitute for palaeomaps that are derived from palaeomagnetic data, but general areagrams adding to the body of knowledge that yields more precise interpretations of the earth's past.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available