4.6 Article

PTEN mutations in uterine sarcomas

Journal

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue 1, Pages 165-169

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6601

Keywords

PTEN mutation; uterine sarcoma; leiomyosarcoma; carcinosarcoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Uterine sarcomas comprise three main types: carcinosarcomas, leiomyosarcomas, and endometrial stromal sarcomas. Carcinosarcomas are highly aggressive neoplasms with a biphasic histology of carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. It is now generally accepted that carcinosarcomas are biphasic tumors that have to be regarded as endometrial carcinomas where metaplasia occurs. Mutations of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene, located on 10q23, play a significant role in the pathogenesis of the endometrioid type of endometrial carcinoma. Loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 10q has been reported in uterine leiomyosarcoma. Since little is known about the molecular pathobiology, our goal was to investigate the potential role of the PTEN gene in the carcinogenesis of uterine sarcomas. Methods. We examined 21 carcinosarcomas, 21 leiomyosarcomas, and 5 endometrial stromal sarcomas using exon-by-exon polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Results. Overall 8.5% (4/47) of uterine sarcomas were found to harbor somatic PTEN mutations. Of these, similar to17% (3/18) were carcinosarcomas with endometrioid-type carcinoma components and similar to5% (1/21) were leiomyosarcomas. No mutations were detected in carcinosarcomas with nonendometrioid carcinoma components (013) and in endometrial stromal sarcomas (0/5). Conclusions. These data suggest that intragenic PTEN mutations are involved in the genesis of uterine carcinosarcomas with endometrioid-type carcinoma components but rarely contribute to the pathobiology of uterine leiomyosarcomas. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available