4.6 Article

Neutrophil elastase induces MUC5AC gene expression in airway epithelium via a pathway involving reactive oxygen species

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/ajrcmb.26.4.4473

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL65611] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neutrophil-predominant airway inflammation and mucus obstruction of the airways are major pathologic features of chronic airway diseases, including cystic fibrosis and chronic bronchitis. Neutrophils release elastase, a serine protease that impairs mucociliary clearance and stimulates goblet cell metaplasia and mucin production. We previously reported that neutrophil elastase increases expression of a major respiratory mucin gene, MUC5AC, by enhancing mRNA stability. However, the molecular mechanisms of elastase-regulated MUC5AC expression are not known. We hypothesized that reactive oxygen species, generated by elastase treatment, mediate MUC5AC gene expression. To test this hypothesis, A549, a respiratory epithelial cell line, was treated with elastase in tine presence or absence of the oxygen radical scavenger, dimethylthiourea, or the iron chelator, desferrioxamine. MUC5AC mRNA levels were assessed by Northern analysis. Both antioxidants significantly inhibited elastase-induced MUC5AC gene expression. Dimethylthiourea also inhibited the neutrophil elastase (NE)-induced increase in MUC5AC expression in normal human bronchial epithelial cells. To determine whether elastase treatment generated reactive oxygen species, A549 and normal human bronchial epithelial cells were loaded with dichlorodihydrofluorescein, a fluorescent indicator of oxidative stress. NE treatment increased cellular fluorescence in both cell types, undicating generation of intracellular reactive oxygen species: We conclude that NE treatment increases MUC5AC gene expression by an oxidant-dependent mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available