4.7 Article

Distinct binding properties of the AT1 receptor antagonist [3H]candesartan to intact cells and membrane preparations

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 7, Pages 1273-1279

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-2952(02)00859-6

Keywords

angiotensin AT(1) receptor; candesartan; non-peptide antagonist; dissociation; CHO cells; membranes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

[H-3]-2-Ethoxy-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]-1H-benzimidazoline-7-carboxylic acid ([H-3]candesartan), a non-peptide angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT(1) receptor) antagonist bound with high affinity and specificity to intact adherent human AT(1) receptor Z, transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. The binding characteristics were preserved when cells were suspended, but the dissociation was 3-4-fold faster and the affinity 2-fold lower, while examining [H-3]candesartan binding to cell membranes. These data suggested the role of C, the intracellular organisation of living CHO-hAT(1) cells in antagonist-AT(1) receptor interactions. Yet, a specific role of microtubule or actin filaments of the cytoskeleton, receptor phosphorylation by Protein Kinase C, membrane polarity, cytoplasmic components like ATP and the need of an intact cell membrane could be excluded. The potential effect of protease degradation or receptor oxidation during the membrane preparation was also unlikely. The dissociation rate and the equilibrium dissociation constant of [H-3]candesartan increased with the temperature for both intact cells and membranes. Thermodynamic studies suggested that the bonds between candesartan and the hAT(1) receptor may be of different nature in intact CHO-hAT(1) cells and membranes thereof. Whereas the binding was almost completely enthalpy-driven on intact cells, there was a mixed contribution of both enthalpy and entropy on membranes. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available