3.8 Article

Effects of mechanized careful logging on natural regeneration and vegetation competition in the southeastern Canadian boreal forest

Publisher

NATL RESEARCH COUNCIL CANADA
DOI: 10.1139/X02-006

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Careful logging regulations in Quebec restrict circulation of harvesting and forwarding or skidding machinery to evenly spaced, parallel trails, which creates a particular pattern of disturbed and relatively undisturbed zones in cutovers. A 7-year monitoring study was established to evaluate the effects of careful logging on vegetation development in the southern boreal forest of Quebec. A total of 255 sample plots (2 m(2)) were located in seven cutovers in predominantly black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP) forests that were whole-tree careful logged: 120 on fresh to moist silty clays or silty clay loams and 135 on dry to fresh loamy sands. Three microsites were sampled: skid trails and the edge and the centre of protection strips. A gradient of disturbance from the skid trail to centre of the protection strip was evident for finer textured sites. Careful logging resulted in high densities of black spruce and balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) (> 20 000 stems/ha each) in the protection strip. Survival of other understory species was also favoured in protection strips. Higher disturbance levels in skid trails favoured establishment of larch (Larix laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch), raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.), and graminoids. Reduction of ericaceous cover occurred in skid trails on coarse-textured sites but was only temporary. Softwood stocking 7 years after harvest (based on 2-m(2) plots), ranged from 69 to 74% on fine- to medium-textured sites and from 31 to 51% on coarse-textured sites. The pattern of vegetation development created by careful logging has important implications for silvicultural decisions and stand modelling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available