4.2 Article

Folate status and socio-demographic predictors of folate status, among a national cohort of women aged 26-36 in Australia, 2004-2006

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00910.x

Keywords

folate status; folic acid; mandatory fortification; women of child-bearing age

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [211316, 435712]
  2. National Heart Foundation of Australia [GOOH 0578]
  3. Tasmanian Community Fund [D0013808]
  4. Veolia Environmental Services
  5. Tasmanian Government's Department of Health and Human Services

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective : To describe serum folate status and the socio-demographic correlates of serum folate status in a national sample of women aged 2636 years in Australia, 20042006. Methods: Stored serum samples from 1,046 women, collected as part of the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health study, were analysed for serum folate. Results: Median (IQR) serum folate was 27.1 nmol/L (18.835.0 nmol/L) with only 7.0% of samples below 11 nmol/L. Serum folate was positively associated with supplement use, educational level, occupational status and urban dwelling. Conclusions: In this population-based sample, most women had folate levels in the normal range with few having low serum folate. Those of lower socioeconomic position or with poorer health behaviours had lower folate levels, though most were still within the normal range. Implications: In the absence of comprehensive national survey data on the folate status of women of child-bearing age, these data provide a valuable baseline for evaluating the impact of mandatory folic acid fortification in Australia, which commenced in 2009. It is likely that mandatory fortification of the food supply with folic acid will reduce the disparities in folate status between socioeconomic groups and in people with poorer health behaviours.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available