4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

The processing of lexical ambiguity: Homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon

Journal

BRAIN AND LANGUAGE
Volume 81, Issue 1-3, Pages 205-223

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2518

Keywords

lexical ambiguity; homonymy; polysemy; metonymy; metaphor; cross-modal; sentence priming

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Under the theoretical assumption that lexical ambiguity is not a homogeneous phenomenon, but rather that it is subdivided into two distinct types, namely homonymy and polysemy, the present study investigated whether these different types of lexical ambiguity are psychologically real. Four types of ambiguous words, homonymous words (e.g., pen), polysemous words with metaphorical extensions (e.g., eye), polysemous words with a count/mass metonymic extension (e.g., turkey), and polysemous words with a producer/product metonymic extension (e.g., Dali). were used in a cross-modal sentence-priming lexical decision task. Overall, the theoretical distinction between homonymy and polysemy was reflected in the results of the present study, which revealed differential processing depending on the type of ambiguity. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science (USA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available