4.5 Article

Influence of optical properties and fiber separation on laser Doppler flowmetry

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 236-243

Publisher

SPIE-INT SOCIETY OPTICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1117/1.1463049

Keywords

Doppler effect; fiber optics; laser Doppler flowmetry; Monte Carlo simulations; optical properties; sampling depth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microcirculatury blood flow can be measured using a laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) probe. However, the readings are affected by the tissues optical properties (absorption and scattering coefficients, mu(a) and mu(s)) and probe geometry. In this study the influence of optical properties [mu(a) is an element of (0.053,0.23) mm(-1), mu(s) is an element of (14.7,45.7) mm(-1)] on LDF perfusion and LDF sampling depth was evaluated for different fiber separations. In vitro measurements were made on a sophisticated tissue phantom with known optical properties that mimicked blood flow at different depths. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to extend the geometry of the tissue phantom. A good correlation between measured and simulated data was found, The simulations showed that, for fixed flow at a discrete depth, the influence of mu(s) or mu(a) on LDF perfusion increased with an increase in flow depth and decreased with an increase in fiber separation. For a homogeneous flow distribution, however, the perfusion varied 40% due to variations in the optical properties, almost independent of the fiber separation (0.23-1.61 mm). Therefore, the effect in real tissue is likely to vary due to the unknown heterogeneous blood flow distribution. Further, the LDF sampling depth increased with a decrease in mu(s) or mu(a) and an increase in fiber separation. For fiber separation of 0.46 mm, the e(-1) sampling depth ranged from 0.21 to 0.39 mm. (C) 2002 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available