4.8 Article

Characterization of microbial community in granular sludge treating brewery wastewater

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 1767-1775

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00377-3

Keywords

anaerobic biogranule; fluorescence in-situ hybridization; oligonucleotide probes; microbial community; 16S rRNA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The diversity and distribution of microbes within brewery-degrading anaerobic sludge granules were studied using various molecular techniques. Molecular cloning of small-subunit rRNA gene sequences indicated that all archaeal clones were affiliated with Methanosaeta concilli (>99% sequence similarity), and the bacterial clones were mostly affiliated with a not-yet-cultured Clostridium cluster (48 out of 99 clones) in the low G + C gram-positive group, Xanthomonas spp. in the gamma-subclass of Proteohacteria (30 clones), and Desulfovibrio spp. (16 clones) in the delta-subclass of Proteobacteria. Slot-blot hybridization indicated that archaeal cells from the Methanomierobiales (58.4% of total rRNA), Methanobacterials (3.3%) and Methanococcales (1.0%) accounted for 62.4% of the total community rRNA. The rest of the microbial populations were the clostridial cluster (27.3% of total rRNA) and Desulfovibrio spp. (9.4%). Fluorescence in-situ hybridization with domain and group-specific oligonucleotide probes further revealed a multi-layer,granular architecture. On the surface layer, the hydrolytic clostridial species and hydrogenotrophic Methanobacteriales were the predominant. In the middle layer, mostly H-producing acetogens from the delta-Proteobacteria (i.e., Dsulfovibrio spp.), hydrogenotrophic Methanobacteriales and aceticlastic Methanosaeta were observed to presumably form a syntrophic association. Finally, the center core consisted of microcolonies of Methanosaeta cells. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available