4.8 Article

Methane reaction with NO over alumina-supported Ru nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
Volume 207, Issue 1, Pages 66-75

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/jcat.2001.3489

Keywords

Ru catalyst; methane partial oxidation; methane total oxidation; structure-sensitive reactions; NO selective reduction by methane

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The reaction between NO (1%) and CH4 (0.55%) over alumina supported Ru nanoparticles is analyzed from NO abatement, methane partial oxidation, and structural sensitivity points of view. The 6 and 12 wt% Ru/Al2O3 catalysts were prepared by deposition of well-defined colloidal Ru nanoparticles on alumina. The NO was selectively converted to N-2 starting from 450degrees C. Methane conversion to COx, H-2, and H2O proved to be structure sensitive at 450degrees C and structure insensitive at T > 450 degreesC. Methane was selectively converted to CO2 at 450 degreesC over the 12% Ru/Al2O3 catalyst having larger average Ru particle size (average particle size, 5.8 nm). Methane was oxidized to CO and CO2 over the 6% Ru/Al2O3 catalyst with smaller Ru nanoparticles (average particle size, 4.8 nm). It is concluded that, at low temperature (450degreesC), methane is preferentially converted to CO and H-2 over small Ru nanoparticles. The highest reaction selectivity to CO (approximate to80%) and H-2 (approximate to78%) was observed at 600 degreesC for both catalysts investigated. Ru/Al2O3 catalysts showed high and stable catalytic activity in time (i.e., 96 h), even at high reaction temperature (600 Q. A selectivity to CO and H-2 of almost 100% was observed at 600 degreesC for both a stoichiometric mixture of NO/CH4 and one with an excess of methane. The catalyst with smaller Ru nanoparticles (6% Ru/Al2O3) was rapidly deactivated either by 02 or by NO, whereas the catalyst with larger Ru particles (12% Ru/Al2O3) proved to be more resistant to oxygen poisoning. Both catalysts were rapidly reactivated in pure CH4. A reaction mechanism is proposed in light of the experimental results. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available