4.6 Article

Deterioration of previous acute lung injury during neutropenia recovery

Journal

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 781-786

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200204000-00010

Keywords

cancer patients; acute respiratory distress syndrome; mechanical ventilation; leukemia; lymphoma; myeloma; solid tumors; neutropenia; neutropenia recovery; pneumonia; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Design: Although neutropenia recovery is associated with a high risk of deterioration of respiratory condition, no studies designed to identify risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in this situation have been published. Setting: Medical ICU in a French teaching hospital. Subjects: We conducted a study to describe critically ill cancer patients with ARDS during neutropenia recovery (defined as the 7-day period centered on the day the neutrophil count rose above 1000/mm(3) [day 0]) and to compare them with critically ill cancer patients without ARDS during neutropenia recovery. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: During a 10-yr period, 62 critically ill cancer patients recovered from neutropenia, of whom 21 experienced ARDS during neutropenia recovery, with a median time of -1 days (-2.5-1) between day 0 and ARDS. In-ICU mortality in these 21 patients was 61.9%. As compared with non-ARDS patients, ARDS patients were less likely to have myeloma and more likely to have leukemia/lymphoma treated with adriamycin, a history of pneumonia before neutropenia, and a neutropenia duration >10 days; they had a shorter time since malignancy diagnosis and a longer time from chemotherapy to neutropenia. Neither the leukocyte counts on day 0 nor those during the 6-day neutropenia recovery period were predictive of ARDS. Conclusions: Patients with acute respiratory failure after prolonged neutropenia complicated by pneumonia are at increased risk for ARDS. (Crit Care Med 2002; 30:781-786).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available