4.8 Article

Serum hepatitis B virus DNA levels and liver histology in inactive HBsAg carriers

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 543-546

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00004-1

Keywords

HBV DNA; hepatitis B surface antigen; hepatitis B e antigen; normal alanine aminotransferase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: A recent NIH research workshop on hepatitis B virus (HBV) revisited the definition of healthy HBsAg carriers. The new definition inactive surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers includes an estimated serum HBV DNA level below 10(5) copies/ml. However, this cut-off value needs to be confirmed. Methods: Eighty-five consecutive patients, HBsAg-positive/HBeAg-negative with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and undetectable serum HBV DNA with standard assay (Versant HBV DNA Assay (bDNA), Bayer) were prospectively followed for 3.2 +/- 2.6 (range 0.5-11) years; 58 underwent a liver biopsy. Serum HBV DNA was quantified with a sensitive polymerase chain reaction assay (Cobas Amplicor HBV Monitor, Roche) (sensitivity 200 copies/ml), and liver histology was assessed using the Ishak scoring system. Results: The median serum HBV DNA level was 1300 copies/ml (<200-179 x 10(3) copies/ml), 16% of the subjects had no detectable serum HBV DNA and 98% had levels below 10(5) copies/ml. Histologic lesions were mild (total score <7) in all cases. Loss of HBsAg was observed in three patients, three patients experienced a transient increase in ALT (<2 x upper limit of normal), and serum HBV DNA levels remained stable (1-6 years) in 97% of the 38 patients retested. Conclusions: In our study of inactive HBsAg carriers, the median serum HBV DNA level was 1300 copies/ml, the serum HBV DNA level was below 10(5) copies/ml in 98% of the patients, and remained stable; histological lesions were mild in all cases. (C) 2002 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available