4.3 Article

Evaluation of treatment in 35 cases of bipolar suicide

Journal

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 503-508

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.1080/00048670902873680

Keywords

bipolar depression; bipolar mood disorder; suicide; treatment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical factors relevant to suicide prevention (including treatment) in cases of bipolar suicide with available therapeutic histories. Method: Victorian Coroner's Office data enabled identification of suicides that occurred between March 1993 and December 2001. Cases involving sufficient clinical notes to enable diagnosis of DSM-IV bipolar disorder and review of treatment were de-identified and assessed by an expert clinical panel. Results: From 3752 suicides, 35 eligible bipolar subjects (22 men, 13 women) aged 40.31.8 years were identified. Duration of illness was 11.91.1 years. A total of 86% had made at least one previous suicide attempt, and 83% were in the depressed phase of illness. A total of 63% manifested psychosis at some time during lifetime illness. Fourteen per cent were inpatients, and 26% suicided within 6weeks of hospital discharge. The panel's retrospective risk assessment concluded that only 48% of cases could have been assessed as high risk. In the 4 weeks prior to suicide, treatment was rated as not reaching benchmark standards in 60% of cases. Electroconvulsive therapy had been given to 11%, lithium to 43% (but definitely therapeutic in only 11%), 31% had never been treated with lithium, and psychosocial interventions did not reach adequate standards in 57% during the previous year. Conclusions: In the majority of bipolar suicide cases in the present case series the subjects did not receive treatment at or above a benchmark standard, often due to illness and situational factors, but also possibly due to inadequate clinical interventions. Strategies to improve treatment may reduce suicide in bipolar disorder.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available