4.4 Article

Contractions associated with the salivary glands of the blood-feeding bug, Rhodnius prolixus:: evidence for both a neural and neurohormonal coordination

Journal

PEPTIDES
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 693-700

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0196-9781(01)00663-5

Keywords

kinins; CRF-related peptides; FMRFamide-related peptides; serotomin; visceral muscle; insect

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM48172] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The salivary glands of the blood-feeding bug, Rhodnius prolixus, are composed of a single epithelial layer of binucleate cells and a double layer of visceral muscle cells surrounding a large secretory cavity. The saliva contains substances which counteract the hemostasis of the host, and injection of saliva into the host is an essential component of successful and efficient gorging. The muscles surrounding the salivary glands of Rhodnius are under polyneuronal control from the salivary nerve projecting out of the hypocerebral ganglion. The amplitude of contractions induced by neural stimulation is dependent upon both intensity and frequency of nerve stimulation. Serotonin and FMRFamide-related peptides (FaRPs) are delivered in the nerve supply to the salivary glands, and both classes of neuroactive chemicals increase frequency and amplitude of phasic contractions in a dose-dependent manner. A member of the FaRP myosuppressin subfamily, however, inhibits contractions. CRF-related and Leucokinin-like peptides are not delivered in the nerve supply but may be present in the hemolymph during feeding. Leucokinin I and Zoone DH (a CRF-related peptide) both induce a dose-dependent increase in basal tonus, with phasic contractions superimposed. Zoone DH is more active than Leucokinin 1. Factors are present in the CNS of Rhodnitts which mimic the effects of serotonin and the stimulatory peptides. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available