4.0 Article

Does obesity really matter? The impact of BMI on embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes after IVF in women aged=38 years

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2012.01453.x

Keywords

embryo; fetal macrosomia; in vitro fertilisation; maternal body mass index; obstetric outcomes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The increasing prevalence of obesity in women of child-bearing age is of growing concern in the health community. Obesity is associated with sub-optimal reproductive performance; therefore, it is understandable that the number of young women with elevated body mass index (BMI) accessing assisted reproductive treatment (ART) is on the rise. Consequently, this study not only assessed the impact of BMI on fertilisation rates, embryo development and freezing during ART in women aged =38years but also determined their subsequent pregnancy and delivery rates. Methods Data were retrospectively analysed from all cycles initiated in 2006/2007 for women aged =38years. The BMI categorisations were as follows: normal 18.524.9kg/m2; overweight 2529.9kg/m2; obese 3034.9kg/m2; morbidly obese class I 3539.9kg/m2; morbidly obese class ? =40kg/m2. Results Obese and morbidly obese women required a significantly higher follicle stimulating hormone start dose than normal BMI women; however, they obtained significantly fewer oocytes (P<0.05). Although BMI did not affect embryo development, morbidly obese class ? women had significantly reduced pregnancy rates compared to normal BMI women (30.5 vs 41.7%, respectively; P<0.05). Furthermore, increasing BMI was positively correlated to increasing rates of preterm delivery (P<0.05). Increasing BMI was also positively correlated to increasing delivery rates of singleton term macrosomic offspring (=4000g). Conclusion Obesity in women aged=38years does not affect embryo development; however, it does reduce clinical pregnancy rates in women with a BMI=40 and increases rates of preterm labour and delivery of macrosomic offspring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available