4.7 Article

Proteomics for the development of DNA tolerizing vaccines to treat autoimmune disease

Journal

CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 103, Issue 1, Pages 7-12

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/clim.2002.5185

Keywords

autoimmune disease; autoantibodies; DNA vaccines; protein arrays; antigen-specific therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [K08 AI01521] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [K08 AR02133] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [U19 DK61943, U19 DK61934] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [5R01NS18235] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Autoimmune disease affects 3% of the world population, yet current therapies that globally suppress immune function are inadequate. Tremendous need exists for specific and curative therapies, an we describe a strategy for development of antigen-specific therapies that inactivate pathogenic lymphocytes causing tissue injury. Major barriers to development of antigen-specific therapies for T-cell-mediated autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and autoimmune diabetes, include M lack of knowledge of the specificity of autoimmune responses, for which proteomic technologies represent powerful tools to identify the self-protein targets of the autoimmune response, and (ii) lack of methods to induce specific immune tolerance, for which DNA tolerizing vaccines represent a promising strategy. We termed our approach Reverse Genomics: use of the proteomics-determined specificity of the autoantibody response to develop and select DNA tolerizing vaccines. Studies performed using animal models for multiple sclerosis and autoimmune diabetes support our Reverse Genomics approach. Through integration of proteomics with specific tolerizing therapies, we are developing a comprehensive approach to treat human autoimmune disease. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available