Journal
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 125-129Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01274.x
Keywords
anovulation; clomiphene; infertility; meta-analysis; metformin; ovulation induction; polycystic ovary syndrome
Categories
Funding
- Serono
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: There are differences in opinion as to whether metformin should play a role in the primary treatment of anovulatory infertility for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Aim: The aim of this study was to ascertain the best available evidence comparing metformin versus clomiphene treatment for non-obese women with anovulatory infertility related to PCOS. Methods: Meta-analysis of available data from randomised controlled trials that examined metformin versus clomiphene for the subgroup of women in the lower body mass index (BMI) range (primarily non-obese). Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy and live birth. Results: For women with BMI <= 30-32 kgm(2), clinical pregnancy rates were 36.7% (52/42) for metformin and 35.7% (51/43) for clomiphene; live birth rates were 30.3% (43/42) for metformin and 30.8% (44/43) for clomiphene. Conclusion: The available randomised trial data show no significant difference in effectiveness of metformin versus clomiphene as ovulation induction agents for non-obese women with anovulatory PCOS. Metformin and clomiphene are both suitable options for first-line treatment.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available