4.6 Article

Rat cultured neuronal and glial cells respond differently to toxicity of unconjugated bilirubin

Journal

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages 535-541

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1203/00006450-200204000-00022

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High levels of unconjugated bilirubin (UCB) can be neurotoxic. Nevertheless, the mechanism of UCB interaction with neural cells is still unknown. This study investigates whether cultured rat neurons and astrocytes respond differently to UCB exposure. UCB toxicity was evaluated by lactate dehydrogenase release. induction of apoptosis, cytoskeleton degeneration, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction, and glutamate uptake. Primary cultures of rat brain astrocytes and neurons were incubated at 37 degreesC with 85.5 muM UCB plus 28.5 muM albumin for 4 h. In assays of glutamate uptake, cells were exposed to 80-120 muM UCB plus 100 muM albumin for 15 min. The results showed that after incubation with 85.5 muM UCB, lactate dehydrogenase release was greater in neurons than in astrocytes (38% versus 14%, p < 0.05). Also, levels of apoptosis were markedly enhanced in neurons (29% versus 19%, p < 0.01). In accordance, neuronal cytoskeleton disassembly was evident during incubation with 85.5 muM UCB, whereas equivalent effects on astrocytes required as much as 171 muM. Conversely, inhibition of MTT metabolism and glutamate uptake by UCB was more pronounced in astrocytes than in neurons (74% versus 60%, p < 0.05 and 41% to 56% versus 25% to 33%, p < 0.05, respectively). In conclusion, the study demonstrates that astrocytes are more susceptible to inhibition of glutamate uptake and MTT reduction by UCB, whereas neurons are more sensitive to cell death by necrosis or apoptosis. These results suggest that UCB is toxic to both astrocytes and neurons, although through distinct pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available