4.4 Article

Priming effect as determined by adding 14C-glucose to modified controlled composting test

Journal

BIODEGRADATION
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 131-140

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020498209463

Keywords

biodegradation; compost; compost maturity; glucose; priming effect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of new biodegradable packaging materials, especially biodegradable plastics, has created a need for biodegradability testing. The European standard for controlled composting test was used in this study for assessing if the addition of a test material results in excess CO2 production in compost. This effect, designated as the priming effect, would give an erroneous result for biodegradation, which is based on CO2 formation from the test material. Glucose was selected as a test substrate because it is the degradation product of starch and cellulose, which are major compounds of many packaging materials. Both C-14-glucose and non-labelled glucose was applied to nine compost samples of variable stability and age from two weeks to 1.5 years. CO2 and (CO2)-C-14 evolution were measured during the incubation. Biodegradation of glucose in unstable composts (age greater than or equal to6 months) was negative and (CO2)-C-14 evolution was poor, although the respective composts without glucose produced relatively high amounts of CO2. It was concluded that a negative priming effect was observed in unstable composts, in which glucose remained mostly non-degraded and apparently inhibited the mineralization of native organic matter in the compost. In stable composts (age greater than or equal to6 months), biodegradation of glucose was high and approximately equal to C-14-glucose mineralization, i.e., the composts showed no priming effect. Young composts were unsuitable for controlled composting test due to lack of stability. It is important to ensure that the compost inoculum used for the test is sufficiently stable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available