4.6 Review

Prognostic factors in localised prostate cancer with emphasis on the application of molecular techniques

Journal

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages 363-371

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00048-9

Keywords

prostate cancer; prognostic factors; molecular techniques

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in males in the Western world and the second leading cause of male cancer death. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) based screening and case finding leads to identification of early stage prostate cancer. It is often difficult to discriminate between patients that need curative treatment and those that can be managed conservatively. Prognostic factors are used to make this clinical decision. Based on the classification proposed by the American College of Pathologists and the World Health Organisation, selected prognostic factors in prostate cancer are described. Clinical applicable factors are stage, grade and serum PSA. Prognostic factors that are not routinely used (for various reasons) are ploidy, histological type and cancer volume in needle biopsies. All other factors (including circulating tumour cells, angiogenesis, growth factors, proliferation rate, apoptosis, nuclear morphometry, neuroendocrine differentiation, loss of chromosomal regions, tumour suppresser genes and adhesion molecules) are promising as prognostic factor although currently their use in clinical decisions is not recommended. The role of these factors in prostate cancer growth and their predictive value are discussed. The rapid developments in molecular techniques allow assessment of structure or function of thousands of genes in a prostate biopsy sample. We expect that molecular characterisation of tumour material will become a clinically important tool to predict prognosis in patients with localised prostate cancer. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available