4.6 Article

Activation of natural killer cells and macrophages by porcine endothelial cells augments specific T-Cell xenoresponse

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 314-322

Publisher

BLACKWELL MUNKSGAARD
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20405.x

Keywords

cellular immunity; cytokines; macrophages; natural killer cells; xenotransplantation

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL57796] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rejection of xenografts is characterized by infiltration of monocytes and natural killer (NK) cells into the graft, suggesting an important role for the innate immune system in xenorecognition. In this study, purified human NK or T cells were cocultured with porcine-endothelial cells, and cytokines were analyzed by ELISA and intracellular FACS. We demonstrated a vigorous human anti-porcine xenoresponse that was associated with a strong T-cell proliferation against porcine endothelial cells. Limiting dilution cloning and T-cell receptor (TCR) Vbeta gene usage revealed a low number of xenoreactive T-cell precursors. We demonstrated that xenogeneic porcine but not allogeneic human endothelial cells induced the early production of interferon (IFN)-gamma by human NK cells but not by CD3(+) T cells. Porcine xenoantigen-induced IFN-gamma production was only partially dependent on IL-12. Blocking IL-12 with neutralizing antibodies or by depletion of human macrophages partially decreased IFN-gamma production by CD56(+) NK cells. Three-color flow cytometry revealed that IL-12 was produced through a species-specific activation of human macrophages by porcine enclothelial cells. Our results indicate that the direct activation of NK cells and macrophages by porcine endothelial cells provides a unique pathway of xenorecognition that augments downstream specific T-cell immunity and represents a powerful effector mechanism in xenograft rejection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available