4.1 Article

Biochemical and genetic diversity of pectolytic enterobacteria causing soft rot disease of potatoes in New Zealand

Journal

AUSTRALASIAN PLANT PATHOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 559-568

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1071/AP08056

Keywords

blackleg; Erwinia; PCR; Solanum tuberosum

Categories

Funding

  1. New Zealand's Foundation for Research, Science Technology [CO2X0501]
  2. Better Border Biosecurity (B3)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The diversity of 89 pectolytic enterobacteria collected from potatoes in New Zealand was investigated by comparing their physiological, biochemical and genetic characteristics with those of type strains of Pectobacterium and strains previously identified as isolates of the genus Dickeya. Biochemical and physiological analyses demonstrated that the predominant pectolytic enterobacterium present in New Zealand is Pectobacterium carotovorum subspecies carotovorum. Isolates of Pectobacterium atrosepticum and strains closely related to Dickeya were also detected. Species and subspecies specific PCR confirmed the identity of the majority of the P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum and P. atrosepticum strains. However, several atypical isolates classified by Biolog as P. carotovorum subsp. carotovorum failed to grow at 37 degrees C or to amplify the pectate lyase-encoding gene (pel gene) characteristic of this subspecies. Restriction fragment length polymorphism ( RFLP) analyses of the 16S-23S intergenic transcribed spacer ( ITS) also identified atypical isolates with unique ITS-RFLP profiles. Further characterisation of the atypical strains, by phylogenetic analysis of their 16S rRNA sequences, clustered them into four groups distinct from pectolytic enterobacteria previously found on potato. Several of the atypical strains proved highly virulent on both tubers and stems of potato, suggesting that a variety of novel species or subspecies are responsible for soft rot of potatoes in New Zealand, including Pectobacterium wasabiae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available