4.7 Article

Evidence for cardiomyocyte repopulation by extracardiac progenitors in transplanted human hearts

Journal

CIRCULATION RESEARCH
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages 634-640

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.0000014822.62629.EB

Keywords

human cardiac allografts; stem cells; transdifferentiation; Y chromosome in situ hybridization; regeneration

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-18029, CA-15074] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL03174, R01 HL61553, R24HL64387] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human myocardium has long been considered to have essentially no intrinsic regenerative capacity. Recent studies in rodent models, however, have suggested the presence of an extracardiac stem cell population, perhaps in bone marrow, that is capable of some reconstitution of cardiomyocytes after injury. To determine whether similar mechanisms exist in the human heart, we evaluated human female allograft hearts transplanted into male patients. The presence of Y chromosomes in cardiomyocytes would indicate these cells arose from the recipient, rather than the donor heart. We identified 5 male patients who had retained a female heart at least 9 months before death and necropsy. Remark-ably, in each case, the transplanted heart contained a minute but readily detectable fraction of Y chromosomepositive cardiomyocytes. The mean percentage of cardiomyocytes arising from the host was estimated to be 0.04% with a median of 0.016%. Most Y-positive cardiomyocytes were associated with regions of acute rejection, suggesting such chimerism involves an injury event. Furthermore, the sole patient whose immediate cause of death was allograft rejection showed a much higher percentage of host-derived cardiomyocytes, up to 29% in local, 1-mm(2) hot spots. Thus, adult humans have extracardiac progenitor cells capable of migrating to and repopulating damaged myocardium, but this process occurs at very low levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available