4.7 Article

On the black hole-bulge mass relation in active and inactive galaxies

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 331, Issue 3, Pages 795-804

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05236.x

Keywords

galaxies : active; galaxies : bulges; galaxies : nuclei; quasars : general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New black hole mass estimates are presented for a sample of 72 active galactic nuclei (AGNs) covering three decades in optical luminosity. Using a subsample of Seyfert galaxies, which have black hole mass estimates from both reverberation mapping and stellar velocity dispersions, we investigate the geometry of the AGNs' broad-line region. It is demonstrated that a model in which the orbits of the line-emitting material have a flattened geometry is favoured over randomly-orientated orbits. Using this model we investigate the M-bh-L-bulge relation for a combined 90-object sample consisting of the AGNs plus a sample of 18 nearby inactive elliptical galaxies with dynamical black hole mass measurements. It is found that, for all reasonable mass-to-light ratios, the M-bh-L-bulge, relation is equivalent to a linear scaling between bulge and black hole mass. The best-fitting normalization of the M-bh-M-bulge relation is found to be M-bh = 0.0012M(bulge), in agreement with recent black hole mass studies based on stellar velocity dispersions. Furthermore, the scatter around the M-bh-L-bulge relation for the full sample is found to be significantly smaller than has been previously reported (Deltalog M-bh = 0.39 dex). Finally, using the nearby inactive elliptical galaxy sample alone, it is shown that the scatter in the M-bh-L-bulge relation is only 0.33 dex, comparable with that of the M-bh -sigma relation. These results indicate that reliable black hole mass estimates can be obtained for high redshift galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available