4.8 Article

Recognition of T•G mismatched base pairs in DNA by stacked imidazole-containing polyamides:: surface plasmon resonance and circular dichroism studies

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 1834-1841

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/30.8.1834

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-61587, R01 GM061587] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An imidazole-containing polyamide trimer, f-ImImIm, where f is a formamido group, was recently found using NMR methods to recognize T.G mismatched base pairs. In order to characterize in detail the T.G recognition affinity and specificity of imidazole-containing polyamides, f-ImIm, f-ImImIm and f-PyImIm were synthesized. The kinetics and thermodynamics for the polyamides binding to Watson-Crick and mismatched (containing one or two T.G, A.G or G.G mismatched base pairs) hairpin oligonucleotides were determined by surface plasmon resonance and circular dichroism (CD) methods. f-ImImIm binds significantly more strongly to the T.G mismatch-containing oligonucleotides than to the sequences with other mismatched or with Watson-Crick base pairs. Compared with the Watson-Crick CCGG sequence, f-ImImIm associates more slowly with DNAs containing T.G mismatches in place of one or two C.G base pairs and, more importantly, the dissociation rate from the T.G oligonucleotides is very slow (small k(d)). These results clearly demonstrate the binding selectivity and enhanced affinity of side-by-side imidazole/imidazole pairings for T.G mismatches and show that the affinity and specificity increase arise from much lower k(d) values with the T.G mismatched duplexes. CD titration studies of f-ImImIm complexes with T.G mismatched sequences produce strong induced bands at similar to330 nm with clear isodichroic points, in support of a single minor groove complex. CD DNA bands suggest that the complexes remain in the B conformation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available