4.7 Article

The hypoxia-inducible genes VEGF and CA9 are differentially regulated in superficial vs invasive bladder cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 86, Issue 8, Pages 1276-1282

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600215

Keywords

bladder neoplasms; angiogenic factors; carbonic acid; cell hypoxia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Regulation by hypoxia may underlie the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in bladder cancer. We have compared the distribution of vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA with a hypoxia marker, carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA IX). vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA was analysed by In situ hybridisation and CA IX by immunochemistry in 22 cases of bladder cancer, The relationship of microvessels to the distribution of CA IX was determined, In a separate series of 49 superficial tumours, CA IX immunostaining was compared with clinico-pathological outcome In superficial and invasive disease there was overlap in the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and CA IX CA IX being more widespread. Both were expressed predominantly on the luminal surface, and surrounding areas of necrosis (invasive tumours), Expression of both factors was greater in superficial disease. Expression was absent within similar to80 mum of microvessels, Unlike vascular endothelial growth factor, CA IX did not predict outcome in superficial disease, Differential responses to reoxygenation provide one explanation: vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA declined rapidly. while CA IX expression was sustained for >72 h. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA in bladder tumours is consistent with hypoxic regulation and suggests differential regulation in superficial vs invasive disease. The expression of CA IX on the luminal-surface justifies investigation of its utility as a therapeutic target/prognosbc indicator. (C) 2002 Cancer Research UK.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available