4.5 Article

210Pb 137Cs and 231,240Pu in East China Sea sediments:: sources, pathways and budgets of sediments and radionuclides

Journal

MARINE GEOLOGY
Volume 183, Issue 1-4, Pages 163-178

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0025-3227(02)00165-2

Keywords

sedimentation; East China Sea; Pb-210; (CS)-C-131; plutonium; Changjiang River

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Profiles of Pb-210, (CS)-C-137 and Pu-239,Pu-240 measured in 83 sediment cores collected from various sedimentary regimes in the East China Sea were analyzed to elucidate the sources, routes and budgets of sediments as well as these radionuclides. Distributions of sedimentation rates and nuclide inventories reveal alongshore transport of sediments, Cs-137 and Pu-239,Pu-240 from the mouth of the Yangtze River toward the south, largely confined to the inner-shelf area (water depth <70 m). Mass balance calculations suggest that the East China Sea is a sink for the particle-reactive Pb-210 and Pu-239,Pu-240, with about one-sixth of their sedimentary budgets supplied via boundary scavenging. In contrast, due to lower affinity of 137CS for particles and rapid turnover of the shelf water, the East China Sea serves as a source for Cs-137. About two-thirds of the cumulative input of 137Cs have been transported out of the East China Sea, leaving the remaining one-third stored in the bottom sediments and the overlying water column. As for the sediment budget, mass balance cannot be established due to a shortfall in sediment supply of more than 30% based on a comparison between input terms documented thus far and the sedimentation flux derived from this study. It is very likely that we have overestimated the sediment burial flux or that long-distance transport from the Yellow River's dispersal system to the East China Sea is underestimated. Alternatively, the imbalance could be explained by the discrepancy between sediment input and output on decadal to centennial timescales. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available