4.0 Article

Superficial lizards in cold climates: Nest site choice along an elevational gradient

Journal

AUSTRAL ECOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 7, Pages 773-779

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2009.01983.x

Keywords

climate change; embryonic survival; Physignathus lesueurii; range margin; viviparity; water dragon

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Embryonic conditions may limit the distributions of egg-laying ectotherms, and recent research suggests that nesting mothers of wide-ranging species may use a number of factors to compensate for differing climates. However, while variation in temporal factors across environmental gradients are common or pervasive (i.e. seasonal timing of nesting), similar evidence for spatial factors is rare (e.g. aspect, openness and depth of nest sites). I tested the idea that a wide-ranging lizard, the Australia water dragon (Physignathus lesueurii), uses nest depth to counter climate differences along a temperature cline at their cold-end range margin. Two measures of nest depth were significantly, inversely related to elevation across six populations spanning 700 m. Elevation explained 83-86% of the variation in nest depth. These findings support a thermal compensatory mechanism for this pattern, although soil moisture compensation is plausible. My results directly support a recent, untested prediction that the evolution of viviparity in reptiles is preceded by a behavioural shift towards increasingly superficial nest sites in cold climates, followed by selection for increased egg retention to avoid temperature extremes. However, in the present study egg desiccation rates increased with increasing elevation in a dry year, suggesting that increased egg retention may evolve in response to lethal hydric conditions, rather than lethal temperatures. When considered alongside recent research, the present study indicates that water dragons possess several mechanisms for adjusting to climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available