4.6 Article

Statin use and the risk of breast and prostate cancer

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 262-267

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200205000-00005

Keywords

breast cancer; pharmacoepidemiology; prostate cancer; statins

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA45762] Funding Source: Medline
  2. FDA HHS [FD-U-000082] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Laboratory data suggest that the cholesterol-lowering statin drugs may have chemopreventive potential against cancer at various sites, including breast and prostate. However, in one trial of pravastatin there was a significant excess of breast cancer in the treatment group. In the present Study, we assessed the relation of statin use to the risk of breast and prostate cancer in our hospital-based Case-Control Surveillance Study of Drugs and Serious Illnesses. Methods. Cases were 1,132 women with breast cancer and 1,009 men with prostate cancer; controls were 1,331 women and 1,387 men admitted for conditions unrelated to statin use. We used multivariate unconditional logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for use of statins compared with no use. Results. The OR for breast cancer among statin users was 1.5 (95% Cl 1.0-2.3), largely accounted for by an OR of 1.8 (95% Cl 0.9-3.6) among cases with carcinoma in situ. Among invasive cases, the OR was 1.2 (95% CI = 0.7-2.0). The odds ratio for prostate cancer overall was 1.2 (95% CI 0.8-1.7), and it was 1.4 (95% Cl = 0.7-2.5) for Stage A. Conclusions. The data from the present study do not support a protective effect of statins against breast or prostate cancer. Detection bias is a possible explanation for the higher ORs observed for carcinoma in situ or early-stage cancer as compared with more invasive cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available