4.0 Article

When have we looked hard enough? A novel method for setting minimum survey effort protocols for flora surveys

Journal

AUSTRAL ECOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 8, Pages 986-998

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01869.x

Keywords

detectability; false-negative; impact assessment; statistical power; survey effort; type II error

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Postgraduate Award (Industry)
  2. Australian Research Council [LP0454979]
  3. Holsworth Wildlife Research Fund
  4. Australian Research Council [LP0454979] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is now a substantial body of literature documenting the detectability of plants and animals under standard survey conditions. Despite the evidence that many flora and fauna species have detection probabilities of less than one, it is still the default assumption of most environmental impact assessment processes that if a species is present, it will be detected. Here we briefly review a number of existing studies that have estimated the survey effort necessary to detect animal species, based on what is known about their detection rates in standard surveys. We then propose a novel method, based on failure-time analysis, for quantifying the detectability of and determining appropriate survey effort for plant species during flora surveys. We provide computer code for implementing the method in the Bayesian freeware WinBUGS. Methods for estimating detectability can be used to inform minimum survey requirements and have important applications in environmental impact assessment and monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available