4.4 Article

A phase I study of nonmyeloablative chemotherapy and adoptive transfer of autologous tumor antigen-specific T lymphocytes in patients with metastatic melanoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 243-251

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002371-200205000-00007

Keywords

adoptive transfer therapy; nonmyeloablative chemotherapy; T cell clones; interleukin-2 therapy; melanoma

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 SC003811-33] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This report describes a phase I clinical trial using nonmyeloablative, lympho-depleting chemotherapy in combination with adoptive imununotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. The chemotherapy-conditioning schedule that induced transient lymphopenia consisted of cyclophosphamide (30 or 60 mg/kg per day for 2 days) followed by fludarabine (25 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days). Immunotherapy for all patients consisted of in vitro expanded, tumor-reactive, autologous T-cell clones selected for high avidity recognition of melanoma antigens. Cohorts of three to six patients each received either no interleukin (IL)-2, low-dose IL-2 (72,000 IU/kg intravenously three times a day to a maximum of 15 doses), or high-dose IL-2 (720,000 IU/kg intravenously three times a day for a maximum of 12 doses). The toxicities associated with this treatment were transient and included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia that resolved in all patients. High dose intravenous IL-2 was better tolerated by patients after chemotherapy than during previous immunotherapy cycles without chemotherapy. No patient exhibited an objective clinical response to treatment, although five patients demonstrated mixed responses or transient shrinkage of metastatic deposits. This study established a nonmyeloablative-conditioning regimen that could be safely administered in conjunction with adoptive T-cell transfer and IL-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available