4.5 Article

Characterization of LPS-induced lung inflammation in cftr-/- mice and the effect of docosahexaenoic acid

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 92, Issue 5, Pages 2169-2176

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00927.2001

Keywords

cystic fibrosis; cytokines; neutrophils; Pseudomonas

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-77839] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-48831] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-15431] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanism by which Pseudomonas causes excessive inflammation in the cystic fibrosis lung is unclear. We have reported that arachidonic acid is increased and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) decreased in lung, pancreas, and ileum from cftr(-/-) mice. Oral DHA corrected this defect and reversed the pathology. To determine which mediators regulate inflammation in lungs from cftr(-/-) mice and whether inhibition occurs with DHA, cftr(-/-) and wild-type (WT) mice were exposed to aerosolized Pseudomonas lipopolysaccharide (LPS). After 2 days of LPS, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), macrophage inflammatory protein-2, and KC levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were increased in cftr(-/-) compared with WT mice and not suppressed by pretreatment with oral DHA. Neutrophil levels were not different between cftr(-/-) and WT mice. After 3 days of aerosolized LPS, neutrophil concentration, TNF-alpha, and the eicosanoids 6-keto-PGF(1alpha), PGF(2alpha), PGE(2), and thromboxane B-2 were all increased in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from cftr(-/-) mice compared with WT controls. Oral DHA had no significant effect on TNF-alpha levels in cftr(-/-) mice. In contrast, neutrophils and eicosanoids were decreased in eftr(-/-) but not in WT mice treated with DHA, indicating that the effects of DHA on these inflammatory parameters may be related to correction of the membrane lipid defect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available