4.4 Article

Georgenia muralis gen. nov., sp nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from a medieval wall painting

Publisher

SOC GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.01984-0

Keywords

Georgenia muralis gen. nov.; sp nov.; 1.6S rDNA sequence; chemotaxonomy; phenotypic characteristics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two bacterial strains, designated 1A-C-T and 3A-1, were studied and, using these results and previously published data, taxonomically classified. Cells of the strains exhibited a rod-coccus cycle. The peptidoglycan determined for 1A-CT was of type Ma with lysine as the diagnostic cell-wall diamino acid and an interpeptide bridge Of L-Lys <-- L-Glu. The menaquinone systems of the two strains contained MK-8(H-4) (82-94%) and MK-7(H-4) (3-11%). The polar lipid profiles consisted of diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphaticlylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol mannoside, two unidentified phospholipids and an unidentified glycolipid. The fatty acid profiles contained predominantly ai-C-15:0 and significant amounts of i-C14:0 and i-C15:1 fatty acids. Genomic fingerprints clearly distinguished strains 1A-C-T and 3A-1 from each other. DNA-DNA relatedness between the two strains (92%) demonstrated that they are members of a single species. Analyses of the 16S rDNA sequences of strains 1A-CT and 3A-1, which were almost identical (99-6% sequence similarity), and comparison with corresponding sequences demonstrated that they represent a novel lineage within the suborder Micrococcineae, most closely related to species of the genera Beutenbergia, Bogoriella and Cellulomonas (94.7-95.7 % sequence similarity). The results demonstrate that the two strains are members of a single new genus and a single novel species. Thus, the name Georgenia muralis gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is strain 1A-C-T (= DSM 14418(T) = CCM 4963(T)). Another strain of the species is strain 3A-1 (= DSM 14419 = CCM 4964).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available