3.8 Article

Determining energy expenditure during some household and garden tasks

Journal

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 895-902

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200205000-00026

Keywords

RMR; MET; sweeping; lawn mowing; window cleaning; vacuuming

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

GUNN, S. M., A. G. BROOKS, R. T. WITHERS, C. J. GORE, N. OWEN, M. L. BOOTH, and A. E. BAUMAN. Determining the energy expenditure during some household and garden tasks. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 895-902, 2002. Purpose: This study: a) calculated the reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) and precision (technical error of measurement, TEM) for (V) over dot O-2 during moderate paced walking, self-paced sweeping, window cleaning. vacuuming and lawn mowing; b) determined which of the five activities rated greater than or equal to 3.0 when exercise intensity was calculated in METs (1 MET or metabolic equivalent = (V) over dot O-2 of 3.5 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)) and multiples of the measured resting metabolic rate (RMR); and c) expanded the limited database on energy expenditure during household and garden activities. Methods: Twelve men and 12 women (mean +/- SD: 39.3 +/- 3.4 yr; 171.6 +/- 9.6 cm; 81.0 +/- 15.5 kg) were measured for RMR and (V) over dot O-2 during the five activities on two separate days via indirect calorimetry by using the Douglas bag method. Results: The interday ICCs and TEMs for the five activities ranged from 0.81 to 0.97 and from 2.1 to 7.0%, respectively. The means were significantly (P < 0.001) above 3.0 for moderate paced walking (range = 3.3-8.7), sweeping (2.9-6.7), window cleaning (3.0-6.0), vacuuming (2.6-4.4), and lawn mowing (4.9-7.5) when (V) over dot O-2, was divided by measured RMR, but one and five subjects scored below 3.0 for sweeping and vacuuming, respectively. Division of exercise (V) over dot O-2 by the convention of 3.5 mL O-2.kg(-1).min(-1) significantly decreased (P < 0.001) each mean, and lawn mowing (5.0 METs) was the only activity where all subjects scored above 3.0 METs (P < 0.001; 3.8-6.4); nevertheless, the means for walking (3.7 METs), sweeping (3.2 METs), and window cleaning (3.6 METs) were also in the moderate intensity category of 3-6 METs. Conclusions: These data: a) emphasize that the (V) over dot O-2 during self-paced moderate intensity walking and self-paced household and garden activities can be measured with reproducibility and precision, b) demonstrate that expressing energy expenditure in conventional METs yields lower values than when it is presented as a multiple of measured RMR, c) suggest that all activities except vacuuming are performed at moderate intensity when energy expenditure is expressed in conventional METs, and d) highlight the biological variability in energy expenditure when different people perform the same task.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available