4.4 Article

EFFECTS OF EXTRA MASS ON THE PELAGIC BEHAVIOR OF A SEABIRD

Journal

AUK
Volume 127, Issue 1, Pages 100-107

Publisher

AMER ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION
DOI: 10.1525/auk.2009.09036

Keywords

at-sea activity; Calonectris diomedea; Cory's Shearwater; foraging strategies; geolocators

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion and fondos FEDER [CGL2006-01315/BOS, BIOCON04/099]
  2. Fundacion Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Satellite transmitters and geographic-positioning-system devices often add substantial mass to birds to which they are attached. Studies on the effects Of Such instruments have focused on indirect measures, whereas the direct influence of extra mass on pelagic behavior is poorly known. We used 2.5-g geolocators to investigate the effect of extra mass on the pelagic behavior of Cory's Shearwaters (Calonectris diomedea) by comparing the traits of a single foraging trip among a group carrying 30-g weights, a group carrying 60-g weights, and a control group. The weights were attached to the birds' backs using typical techniques for attaching satellite transmitters to seabirds. The extra mass increased the duration of the birds' trips and decreased their foraging efficiency and mass gained at sea. These indirect effects may be related to foraging traits: weighted birds showed a greater search effort than control birds, traveled greater distances, covered a greater foraging area, and increased the maximum foraging range. Furthermore, the time spent on the sea surface at night was greater for weighted than for control groups, which showed that the extra mass also affected activity patterns. Our results underline the need to quantify the effects of monitoring equipment commonly used to study the pelagic behavior of seabirds. We suggest that geolocators can be used to obtain control data on foraging-trip movements and activity patterns, Received 21 December 2008, accepted 20 August 2009,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available