☆ 4.4 Letter

Does a lack of design and repeatability compromise scientific criticism? A response to Smith et al. (2009).

AUK (2009)

Journal

AUK

Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages 922-926

Publisher

AMER ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION

DOI: 10.1525/auk.2009.126.4.2

Keywords

-

Categories

Ornithology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protocol

Community support

Reagent

Community support

Authors

I am an author on this paper

Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4

Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty

-

Significance

-

Scientific rigor

-

Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available

No Data Available

No Data Available

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.