4.4 Article

SOURCES OF ASSIMILATED PROTEIN IN A SPECIALIZED TROPICAL FRUGIVOROUS BIRD, THE YELLOW-THROATED EUPHONIA (EUPHONIA HIRUNDINACEA)

Journal

AUK
Volume 126, Issue 1, Pages 175-180

Publisher

AMER ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION
DOI: 10.1525/auk.2009.07203

Keywords

Euphonia hirundinacea; feeding habits; frugivory; insectivory; nutritional ecology; stable isotopes; Yellow-throated Euphonia

Categories

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most frugivorous birds must complement their diet with insects to fulfill their protein requirements; species that rely almost exclusively on fruits are rare. We used nitrogen (N-15:N-14) stable-isotope analysis of whole blood to quantify and compare the use of insects and fruits as sources of assimilated nitrogen in a specialized frugivorous bird, the Yellow-throated Euphonia (Euphonia hirundinacea). Nitrogen stable-isotope analysis is particularly useful for examining the relative contribution of animal and plant products as sources of assimilated nitrogen, because there is trophic enrichment of the heavier isotope in higher trophic levels of food webs. We found that most assimilated nitrogen was derived from fruits (76-100%), with a slight increase in the contribution of fruits as their abundance increased. In comparisons of bird species, delta N-15 values of Yellow-throated Euphonia were lower than those of insectivorous and piscivorous species but similar to the values found in seed-fruit eaters. Our results suggest that the dependence on fruits as a source of assimilated nitrogen in Yellow-throated Euphonia ranged from predominant to almost exclusive during the period of our study (February-August). Total dependence on fruits as a source of assimilated nitrogen is not a common phenomenon among birds, but it may be favored in the tropics, where fruits are more abundant and diverse. Received 11 December 2007 accepted 29 September 2008.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available