4.8 Article

Autoimmunity due to molecular mimicry as a cause of neurological disease

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 509-513

Publisher

NATURE AMERICA INC
DOI: 10.1038/nm0502-509

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 10522] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [K23 AI001600, K23 AI001600-04] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01-NS-38876] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One hypothesis that couples infection with autoimmune disease is molecular mimicry. Molecular mimicry is characterized by an immune response to an environmental agent that cross-reacts with a host antigen, resulting in disease(1,2). This hypothesis has been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetes, lupus and multiple sclerosis (MS)(1-4). There is limited direct evidence linking causative agents with pathogenic immune reactions in these diseases. Our study establishes a clear link between viral infection, autoimmunity and neurological disease in humans. As a model for molecular mimicry, we studied patients with human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1)-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP), a disease that can be indistinguishable from MS (refs. 5-7). HAM/TSP patients develop antibodies to neurons(8). We hypothesized these antibodies would identify a central nervous system (CNS) autoantigen. Immunoglobulin G isolated from HAM/TSP patients identified heterogeneous nuclear ribonuclear protein-A1 (hnRNP-A1) as the autoantigen. Antibodies to hnRNP-A1 cross-reacted with HTLV-1-tax, the immune response to which is associated with HAM/TSP (refs. 5,9). Immunoglobulin G specifically stained human Betz cells, whose axons are preferentially damaged(7). Infusion of autoantibodies in brain sections inhibited neuronal firing, indicative of their pathogenic nature. These data demonstrate the importance of molecular mimicry between an infecting agent and hnRNP-A1 in autoimmune disease of the CNS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available