4.5 Article

A novel formulation for superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) particles enhancing MR lymphography:: Comparison of physicochemical properties and the in vivo behaviour

Journal

JOURNAL OF DRUG TARGETING
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 221-230

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10611860290022651

Keywords

MR lymphography; starch; superparamagnetic iron oxides; blood half-life

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The major aim of this study was to prove or disprove the theories concerning the correlation between physicochemical properties of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) particles and their accumulation in the lymph nodes. New SPIO particles were produced using starch as stabilising polymer shell. The synthesis was done in a two-step procedure using conventional wet-chemical precipitation technique and subsequent coating of the iron oxide cores. The particles were physicochemically characterised and their lymphotrophy studied in rats using well described lymphotropic dextran-coated SPIO particles as reference. Despite the short blood half-lives of approximately 13 min and the relatively large sizes (approximately 60-90 nm), the starch SPIO particles proved at least as efficient in lymph node accumulation as the small 25 nm dextran SPIO particles having a half-life of 90 min. The currently accepted theories concerning the connection between particle properties and their uptake into lymph nodes are not generally valid, or have at least to be limited for dextran-coated SPIO particles. Lymph node targeting could be achieved despite the present theories consider small size (< 30 nm) and long circulation times in the blood as prerequisites. Histological examination showed, that SPIO particles could only be found in lymph node areas where macrophages could be marked which enclosed the particles. Localisation in marginal areas of the lymph nodes indicates endothelial transcytosis as the major accumulation pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available