4.5 Article

A reduction in the number of peripheral CD28+ CD8+ T cells in the acute phase of influenza

Journal

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 128, Issue 2, Pages 339-346

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2002.01819.x

Keywords

influenza; CD8; CD28; CD45RO; lymphopenia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Influenza patients show a high incidence of T lymphocytopenia in the acute phase of the illness. Since CD8(+) T cells play an important role in influenza virus infection, we investigated which subset of CD8(+) T cells was involved in this lymphocytopenia. CD8(+) T cells from eight patients with influenza A were studied for lymphocyte count, surface marker, and intracellular IFN-gamma production in the acute (days 1-3) and recovery phases (days 9-12). Total and T lymphocyte counts in the acute phase were approximately three times less than in the recovery phase; however, the CD4/8 ratio was the same in both phases. The cell count reduction in the acute phase was attributed predominantly to the CD28(+) CD8(+) subset, compared with the CD28(-) CD8(+) subset. The memory/activation marker CD45RO on the CD8(+) T cells was assessed. The CD28(+) CD45RO(-) subset, a naive phenotype, was reduced significantly in number in the acute phase compared with the recovery phase. The CD28(+) CD45RO(+) subset, a memory phenotype, was also reduced in the acute phase, but the reduction was not statistically significant. Intracellular IFN-gamma in the CD8(+) subset after mitogenic stimulation was measured by flow cytometry; the percentage of CD28(+) IFN-gamma/CD8(+) subset in the acute phase was significantly less than in the recovery phase. These results indicated that the predominant reduction of peripheral CD8(+) T cells in the acute phase of influenza was from naive-type lymphocytes, suggesting that these quantitative and qualitative changes of CD8(+) T cells in influenza are important for understanding the immunological pathogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available