4.5 Article

Canonical rules for plant organ biomass partitioning and annual allocation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages 812-819

Publisher

BOTANICAL SOC AMER INC
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.89.5.812

Keywords

allometry; biomass allocation; organ biomass; plant growth

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we review a general allometric model for the allometric relationships among standing leaf, stem, and root biomass (M-L, M-S, and M-R, respectively) and the exponents for the relationships among annual leaf, stem, and root biomass production or growth rates (G(L), G(S), and G(R), respectively). This model predicts that M-L proportional to M-S(3/4) proportional to M-R(3/4) such that M-S proportional to M-R and that G(L) proportional to G(S) proportional to G(R). A large synoptic data set for standing plant organ biomass and organ biomass production spanning ten orders of magnitude in total plant body mass supports these predictions. Although the numerical values for the allometric constants governing these scaling relationships differ between angiosperms and conifers, across all species, standing leaf, stem, and root biomass, respectively, comprise 8%, 67%, and 25% of total plant biomass, whereas annual leaf, stem, and root biomass growth represent 30%, 57%, and 13% of total plant growth. Importantly, our analyses of large data sets confirm the existence of scaling exponents predicted by theory. These scaling rules emerge from simple biophysical mechanisms that hold across a remarkably broad spectrum of ecologically and phyletically divergent herbaceous and tree-sized monocot, dicot, and conifer species, As such, they are likely to extend into evolutionary history when tracheophytes with the stereotypical leaf, stem, and root body plan first appeared.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available