4.5 Article

Glucocorticoid (GC) sensitivity and GC receptor expression differ in thymocyte subpopulations

Journal

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 463-469

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/intimm/14.5.463

Keywords

Annexin V; anti-GCR mAb; apoptosis; dexamethasone; negative selection; positive selection; RU43044

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Positive and negative selection steps in the thymus prevent non-functional or harmful T cells from reaching the periphery. To examine the role of glucocorticoid (GC) hormone and its intracellular receptor (GCR) in thymocyte development we measured the GCR expression in different thymocyte subpopulations of BALB/c mice with or without previous dexamethasone (DX), anti-CD3 mAb, RU-486 and RU-43044 treatment. Four-color labeling of thymocytes allowed detection of surface CD4/CD8/CD69 expression in parallel with intracellular GCR molecules by flow cytometry. Double-positive (DP) CD4(+)CD8(+) thymocytes showed the lowest GCR expression compared to double-negative (DN) CD4(-)CD8(-) thymocytes and mature single-positive (SP) cells. DX treatment caused a concentration-dependent depletion of the DP cell population and increased appearance of mature SP cells with reduced GCR levels. GCR antagonists (RU-486 or RU-43044) did not influence the effect of DX on thymocyte composition; however, RU-43044 inhibited the high-dose GC-induced GCR down-regulation in SP and DN cells. GCR antagonists alone did not influence the maturation of thymocytes and receptor numbers. Combined low-dose anti-CD3 mAb and DX treatment caused an enhanced maturation (positive selection) of thymocytes followed by the elevation of CD69(+) DP cells. The sensitivity of DP thymocytes with a GCR(low)phenotype to GC action and the ineffectiveness of the GCR antagonist treatment may reflect a non-genomic GC action in the thymic selection steps.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available