4.4 Article

Assessment of inspiratory flow limitation in children with sleep-disordered breathing by a nasal cannula pressure transducer system

Journal

PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 380-387

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.10096

Keywords

sleep apnea; flow limitation; nasal cannula pressure; sleep disorders; polysomnography; apnea; upper airway obstruction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A nasal cannula pressure transducer system identifies inspiratory flow limitation and increased upper airway resistance in adults with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether nasal cannula pressure (NCP) detects apneas and hypopneas as well as additional flow-limited events associated with increased airway resistance in children. We studied NCP in 47 patients (ages 2-14 years) referred for SDB to a university-based sleep disorders program during nocturnal polysomnography (NPSG). During NPSG, airflow was assessed simultaneously by thermistor and NCP. There was a high correlation between apneas assessed by thermistor (T) and NCP (r = 0.90, P < 0.0001), and for hypopneas using these two methods (r = 0.94, P = 0.0001). Respiratory driving pressure was indirectly measured with an esophageal pressure catheter. Flow-limited (flattened) NCP waves were associated with significantly higher driving pressure, indicating elevated upper airway resistance, compared to nonflow-limited (rounded) waves during nonrapid eye movement (NREM) (P = 0.05) and rapid eye movement (REM) (P = 0.01) sleep, Patients were classified as either having obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) or primary snoring, based on standard NPSG criteria. NCP identified additional respiratory events with a flattened contour (FC) not detected by thermistor. NCP is a noninvasive device that identifies obstructive apneas and hypopneas as well as additional respiratory events associated with flow limitation in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2002; 33:380-387. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available