4.6 Article

Real-world efficacy of prescription and over-the-counter nicotine replacement therapy

Journal

ADDICTION
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages 505-516

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00141.x

Keywords

cigarette smoking; nicotine gum; nicotine patch; nicotine replacement; over-the-counter; prescription; smoking cessation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims To assess smoking cessation rates achieved with nicotine gum and patch in simulated over-the-counter (OTC) and actual prescription (Rx) settings. Design Separate open-label studies with guru and patch in OTC and Rx settings. Participants There were multiple samples: OTC gum: 2981 smokers; OTC 1 patch: 2367; Rx gum: 324; Rx patch: 669. Interventions All smokers received active nicotine replacement. In the OTC setting, smokers self-selected doses of nicotine gum (2 or 4 mg Nicorette(R)) or patch (21, 14 or 7 mg NicoDerm(R), CQ). No intervention was provided. In the Rx setting, smokers were prescribed gum or patch by their physician. Measurements Biochemically verified continuous smoking abstinence was assessed at 6 weeks (28-day abstinence) and 6 months. Findings OTC success rates were consistently higher than Rx rates: differences were significant at 6 weeks for both patch [OR = 1.45 (1.05-.1.98)] and gum [OR 2.92 (1.58-5.40)], and remained significant at 6 months for patch [OR 3.63: (1.74-7.61)] but not gum [OR = 1.37: (0.73-2.58)]. Among OTC gum users, 16.1% were abstinent at 6 weeks and 8.4'% at 6 months. For Rx gum users, abstinence rates were 7.7% at 6 weeks and 7.7% at 6 months. With OTC patch, 19.0% were abstinent at 6 weeks and 9.2% at 6 months. With Rx patch, abstinence rates were 16.0% at 6 weeks and 3.0%, at 6 months. Conclusions Smoking cessation rates achieved with nicotine gum and patch under OTC conditions were as good as those under real-world prescribing conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available