4.7 Article

Uranium and thorium isotopic and concentration measurements by magnetic sector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Journal

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 185, Issue 3-4, Pages 165-178

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2541(01)00404-1

Keywords

uranium; thorium; isotope; ICP-MS; TIMS; U-Th dating

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have developed techniques by sector-Field inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for measuring the isotopic composition and concentration of uranium and thorium, focusing on the rare isotopes, Th-230 and U-234, These isotopes have been widely used as tracers in earth sciences, e.g., chronology, paleoclimatology, archeology, hydrology, geochemistry, and oceanography. Measurements made on reference materials demonstrate that the analytical precision approximates counting statistics and that the accuracy of the measurement is within error of accepted values. Routine measurement times are 20 min for U and 10 min for Th, The sensitivities (ions counted/atoms introduced) are 2-3parts per thousand for U and 1.5-2parts per thousand for Th. Samples of 10-40 ng of U-238 (0.5-2.0 pa of U-234) give measurement precisions of 1-2parts per thousand (2sigma) for delta(234)U and U concentration ([U]). Only 0.4 pa of Th-230 are needed to achieve [Th-230] and Th-230/Th-232 data with errors less than 5parts per thousand even for cases where Th-230/Th-232 is 10(-5) or less. Our ICP-MS data, including uranium standards, thorium standards, U-238-U-234-Th-230-Th-232 dating of speleothems and Th-230-Th-232 in oceanic particulates, replicates measurements made by thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS). Compared to TIMS, the ICP-MS method allows smaller sample size and higher sample throughput due to higher sensitivity, fewer sample preparation steps and shorter measurement times. However, mass biases, intensity biases, spectral interferences and instrumental blanks are significant and must be addressed. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available